I want to pursue two bodies of work in parallel: one inside
the computer and inside language, and the other outside the computer and
largely outside language. In my practice currently I experience difficulty
bridging these two interests and ways of working; I hope that by intentionally
exploring each side of this coin separately, I can find a point at which both
relate. These ideas are so far inchoate, but interests that come to mind as
related to the investigations I intend to conduct are:
1.) Translation and language: I’d like to continue pursuing
my interests in 3D scanning and printing, processes I think of as translations,
and which I’m interested in connecting to language. I am also interested in the
inconsistencies and difficulties of switching between systems of symbols, such
as languages, or code and speakable language. I will consider writing and
programming as investigations in these interests.
2.) Honesty: Often, biases, assumptions, and subjective
judgments challenge a thinker’s honesty—it’s nearly impossible to arrive at
objective conclusions, or unbiased data. Computers are capable of doing this,
but not their operators. This to me is an important difference between the kind
of work and methods of working that can be accomplished in a digital world versus
non-digital media. This is a difference I’d like to explore. I also see
language as a frequent barrier to honest ways of working, since language can
justify, rationalize, and obscure decisions. My interest in honesty thus likewise
relates to my interest in language.
All this is to say that I want to question the honesty of my
work all the time.
3.) Memory: Personal memory is the anti-data, I think: it’s
not quantized, it’s not honest or objective, and it’s not universal. But, like
a computer system relies on heaps of numerals and calculations to execute
decisions, we too depend on and carry with us personal memory as a kind of
emotional dataset. So much language is devoted to the expression of this
“data”—this is all interesting to me as an artist and a programmer, and a
human.
Ultimately I want to make work that reflects an interest in
what it means to be a human, particularly in a technological age.
I want to end this proposal with a poem by Wallace Stevens
that is central to my thinking and practice, called “the Idea of Order at Key
West”:
She sang beyond the genius of the sea.
The water never formed to mind or voice,
Like a body wholly body, fluttering
Its empty sleeves; and yet its mimic motion
Made constant cry, caused constantly a cry,
That was not ours although we understood,
Inhuman, of the veritable ocean.
The sea was not a mask. No more was she.
The song and water were not medleyed sound
Even if what she sang was what she heard,
Since what she sang was uttered word by word.
It may be that in all her phrases stirred
The grinding water and the gasping wind;
But it was she and not the sea we heard.
For she was the maker of the song she sang.
The ever-hooded, tragic-gestured sea
Was merely a place by which she walked to sing.
Whose spirit is this? we said, because we knew
It was the spirit that we sought and knew
That we should ask this often as she sang.
If it was only the dark voice of the sea
That rose, or even colored by many waves;
If it was only the outer voice of sky
And cloud, of the sunken coral water-walled,
However clear, it would have been deep air,
The heaving speech of air, a summer sound
Repeated in a summer without end
And sound alone. But it was more than that,
More even than her voice, and ours, among
The meaningless plungings of water and the wind,
Theatrical distances, bronze shadows heaped
On high horizons, mountainous atmospheres
Of sky and sea.
It was her voice that made
The sky acutest at its vanishing.
She measured to the hour its solitude.
She was the single artificer of the world
In which she sang. And when she sang, the sea,
Whatever self it had, became the self
That was her song, for she was the maker. Then we,
As we beheld her striding there alone,
Knew that there never was a world for her
Except the one she sang and, singing, made.
Ramon Fernandez, tell me, if you know,
Why, when the singing ended and we turned
Toward the town, tell why the glassy lights,
The lights in the fishing boats at anchor there,
As the night descended, tilting in the air,
Mastered the night and portioned out the sea,
Fixing emblazoned zones and fiery poles,
Arranging, deepening, enchanting night.
Oh! Blessed rage for order, pale Ramon,
The maker's rage to order words of the sea,
Words of the fragrant portals, dimly-starred,
And of ourselves and of our origins,
In ghostlier demarcations, keener sounds.
I mentioned that your proposal brings up the classical split between what we might call eros and logos or as Nietzsche called is "dionysian vs appolinian" ways of being. The art world often follows this trend of binary thinking. See this essay that I wrote about binaries in the art world and follow the links to Katy Siegel and Amy Sillman's writing/lectures regarding similar issues.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.fluentcollab.org/mbg/index.php/interview/index/180/115
about translation - have you thought about looking at Alejandro Cesarco's work? He gave a lecture at the Ft Worth Modern recently. You could find the podcast on their site and see his site
http://www.cesarco.info/
I think that the final sound piece was the most promising so far but I can see that the sculptures and related texts could expand into something multidimensional and ambitious.
also for a good analysis on the ways that misunderstandings can be productive in poetry see Harold Bloom's, The Anxiety of Influence
ReplyDeletefinally, for an artist that uses poetry and sculpture, see Roni Horn's work with Emily Dickinson
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments, Noah! This is an excellent set of sources.
ReplyDeleteI think your work might be similar to DiVonte's. Roni Horn is an interesting artist who I will make note of. I think Michael would be very interested in this work.
ReplyDeleteI really like the idea of art created through the concept of memory. Your work seems to be out of the box and innovative. The artist that came to mind for me was Molly Gochman, she is very personal about her work. She does alot of work with the idea of memory and works in different mediums.
ReplyDeleteThis, for exampl,e was a video that she created on the concept.
http://www.mollygochman.com/works/video-documentation/memory-collage/